The Open Society and Its Enemies

by Matt Barganier | Apr 6, 2005 | 0 comments

Matt Welch notes a most interesting trend for the Bush years:
    Number of documents classified by the Executive Branch, annually: 2001: 8.7 million 2002: 11.3 million 2003: 14.2 million 2004: 15.7 million Number of documents declassified by the Executive Branch, annually: 2001: 100 million 2002: 44 million 2003: 43 million 2004: 28 million
For those keeping score, that's an 80% increase in annual classifications and a 72% decrease in annual declassifications in one term. Given that this administration has already attempted to retroactively classify publicly available documents, I expect mandatory mass amnesia by 2008. UPDATE 3:45 CT: Some interesting comments in the Hit & Run thread. One commenter includes the following figures for Clinton's second term:
    Number of documents classified by the Executive Branch, annually: 1997: 6.5 million 1998: 7.3 million 1999: 8.0 million 2000: 11.1 million Number of documents declassified by the Executive Branch, annually: 1997: 204 million 1998: 193 million 1999: 127 million 2000: 75 million
Score: a 71% increase in classifications and a 63% decrease in declassifications. Hey, I never said Clinton was great, either. Other commenters point out that since there are a finite number of classified documents, and many of the earliest declassifications were probably of the oldest, least exciting material lying around, a steady decrease in declassifications might be perfectly natural. So analyzing declassifications on numbers alone may not reveal that much. But as for classifications, I think it's important to look not only at rates of increase, but also at absolute differences. Yes, Clinton's classifying increased significantly during his second term, but it still peaked at 11.1 million. Bush was at 15.7 million by the end of his first term. That's a lot of ass-covering for both, but for Bush especially.

Join the Discussion!

We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.

For more details, please see our Comment Policy.